Skip to content

Sen. Cruz, Judiciary Committee Colleagues Seek Answers on Citizenship Granted Through Failures, Fraud

DHS Watchdog: Agency Allowed Citizenship for 858 People Ordered Deported

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), and nine other Judiciary Committee members, are calling on the Justice Department (DOJ) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to explain what actions are being taken to ensure that the Obama administration does not continue to grant U.S. citizenship to ineligible immigrants, including criminals and individuals who have previously been ordered deported. The senators’ request follows a Homeland Security Inspector General report that found that at least 858 individuals – many from countries with ties to terrorism – were granted U.S. citizenship despite having final orders of removal under another name because DHS failed to properly update and share digital fingerprint records used in vetting foreign nationals. 

In a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and Attorney General Loretta Lynch, the senators are seeking details on the individuals listed in the report as well as whether the departments are using their full authorities to update the fingerprint databases, improve information sharing with FBI databases and correct the statuses of all individuals who were granted citizenship in error. 

“According to the report, USCIS granted citizenship despite not having digital fingerprint records to aid with the necessary identity verification,” the senators wrote. “Thus, these applicants, many of whom lied on their applications, may not have been eligible for citizenship. This is particularly troubling given these new citizens’ ability to obtain security clearances, serve in law enforcement, sponsor other aliens’ entry into the United States, and hold positions of public trust.  In fact, the report found that one citizen is now a law enforcement official and at least three obtained licenses to conduct security sensitive work… Citizenship is a privilege that cannot be obtained through fraud, accident, or oversight. Yet, according to this IG report, that is precisely what has happened.”

The report indicated that fingerprint records for at least 148,000 immigrants, many from countries with ties to terrorism, who have been ordered removed have not yet been uploaded to the digital fingerprint databases used to identify immigrants. As a result some individuals who may have criminal records or have previously been deported, are being granted citizenship under an alias.  The investigation found that at least three individuals who were previously deported were later granted citizenship under different identities and were able to obtain security clearances to work at commercial airports.

Along with Sens. Cruz and Grassley, the letter is signed by Sens. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), John Cornyn (R-Texas), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), David Vitter (R-La.), David Perdue (R-Ga.) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.). 

Read the letter in its entirety here and below:

September 20, 2016

VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

The Honorable Jeh Johnson
Secretary
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Washington, D.C. 20528 

The Honorable Loretta Lynch
Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
Washington, D.C. 20530       

Dear Secretary Johnson and Attorney General Lynch:

We write today regarding a disturbing Department of Homeland Security Inspector General (DHS OIG) report that found U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) granted citizenship to at least 858 individuals from special interest countries or countries with high rates of immigration fraud, who had final deportation orders under another identity.     

According to the report, USCIS granted citizenship despite not having digital fingerprint records to aid with the necessary identity verification. Thus, these applicants, many of whom lied on their applications, may not have been eligible for citizenship.  This is particularly troubling given these new citizens’ ability to obtain security clearances, serve in law enforcement, sponsor other aliens’ entry into the United States, and hold positions of public trust.  In fact, the report found that one citizen is now a law enforcement official and at least three obtained licenses to conduct security sensitive work. 

Although USCIS’s procedures require checking applicant’s fingerprints against DHS and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) digital fingerprint repositories, many older fingerprints taken on paper cards had not yet been digitized and therefore, were not subsequently added to the DHS database (IDENT).  When USCIS queried the database for these applicants, fingerprint records for the 858 were unavailable and officials were unable to find all potentially derogatory information, including outstanding removal orders and evidence of fraud.  Further, the report found that the FBI fingerprint database (NGI) was also missing records because DHS officials did not always forward fingerprints to the FBI after an immigration encounter. Therefore, these 858 were naturalized without being fully vetted.  In fact, DHS has yet to review files for 148,000 aliens with final removal orders who were criminals or fugitives in order to retrieve and digitize old fingerprint cards. Unfortunately, these concerns are not new.  The Department has had problems with digitizing its records and effectively communicating and streamlining information sharing since 2008, and we have continually called on the Department to ensure adequate protections and safeguards.  

The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) sets forth criteria that individuals must meet in order to be eligible for citizenship.   Lying under oath about identity or immigration history as well as having a final deportation order may render an applicant ineligible.  Additionally, under the INA, naturalization can be revoked if citizenship was obtained through fraud or misrepresentation.  According to the IG report, however, only 122 cases have been investigated, and the US Attorney’s Office (USAO) has accepted only two cases for prosecution.  

Citizenship is a privilege that cannot be obtained through fraud, accident, or oversight. Yet, according to this IG report, that is precisely what has happened.  Accordingly, to better understand the circumstances surrounding this report and what actions are being taken to mitigate the damage, please answer the following questions no later than October 3, 2016.  Please also provide knowledgeable staff to brief our staff as soon as possible. 

1.      Please provide the names, countries of origin, and current immigration status of all 858 individuals included in this report.  If an individual comes from a special interest country, please include that designation in the response. 

2.  Please provide a list of the countries designated as those with high risk of immigration fraud. 

3.  Under the INA, an individual may be denaturalized administratively, as a result of revocation proceedings brought by a U.S. Attorney, or as a result of a criminal conviction for unlawful procurement of citizenship.   According to the IG Report, ICE did not pursue investigation of individuals because the relevant U.S. Attorneys would “not accept immigration benefit fraud cases for criminal prosecution” and ICE needed to “focus their resources on investigating cases the USAO will prosecute.” 

a.  Is it accurate that the Department of Justice will generally not accept revocation cases under INA 340(a) for individuals in this group if brought by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)?  If not, how many of the cases is the Department of Justice (DOJ) considering taking for revocation action under INA 340(a)?

b.  Is DHS considering administrative revocation under INA 340(h) for any of these cases? Please explain. 

c.  Is DOJ considering criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. 1425 for unlawful procurement of citizenship for any of these cases? Please explain. 

d.  Please provide a detailed summary of all 90 investigations closed by ICE in March 2015 and an update on the 32 investigations ICE opened in March 2015.

4.      According to the IG report, most, if not all, of the individuals who were granted citizenship, lied or misrepresented their immigration status on their application forms.  This means most, if not all, fraudulently obtained citizenship, and should be denaturalized, and potentially also criminally prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. 1425.  Why are ICE and DOJ only focusing on persons with Transportation Security Administration credentials, security clearances, positions of public trust, or criminal histories?  Once those individuals are investigated, will ICE investigate the remaining individuals who should not have been granted naturalization?

a.     Please provide information on the number of individuals who erroneously received U.S. citizenship and obtained a security clearances, served in a position of public trust, and/or petitioned for immigration status for a foreign national. 

5.      ICE intends to grant a contract by the end of FY 2016 for placing the remaining 148,000 fingerprints into IDENT.  Please provide a detailed timeline for contract completion.

6.      What actions are ICE and USCIS taking now to prevent others who do not qualify for naturalization, but whose fingerprints may not yet be in IDENT or NGI, from mistakenly being granted naturalization?  

7.      In 2016, DHS eliminated Operation Janus.  What, if anything, does DHS plan to deploy to take the place of Operation Janus so that the important work of the Operation may still be conducted?  Please explain. 

8.      What, if anything, has DHS done to increase communication with the FBI after encountering an individual and taking prints? Please explain. 

Thank you for your attention to this important matter.  Should you have any questions, please contact Katherine Nikas of Judiciary Committee staff at (202) 224- 5225.              

Sincerely,

Charles E. Grassley
Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee

Orrin G. Hatch
United States Senator

Jeff Sessions
United States Senator

Lindsey O. Graham
United States Senator

John Corny
United States Senator

Michael S. Lee
United States Senator

Ted Cruz
United States Senator

Jeff Flake
United States Senator

David Vitter
United States Senator                    

David A. Perdue
United States Senator

Thom Tillis
United States Senator

###